MSEM 6100 Week 7: Emergency Management Response

MSEM 6100: Critical Issues in Emergency Management | Week 7

Every year, states like Arizona, California, and Texas are ravaged by hundreds of wildfires. These fires burn acre upon acre, cause millions of dollars of property damage, and take many lives. Each municipality and state responds to these emergencies according to the needs of their respective communities. In September 2011, a firestorm in Bastrop, Texas, devastated the town and was considered the worst fire in Texas history. Governor Rick Perry asked President Barack Obama to declare 252 of Texas’ 254 counties as disaster areas. In this situation, local, state, and federal agencies worked together to respond to this massive incident.

We will write a custom paper on

MSEM 6100 Week 7: Emergency Management Response

specifically for you
Order Now

This week, you examine the impact of Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5: Management of Domestic Incidents (HSPD-5) on local disaster response plans. You also consider potential changes to HSPD-5. Then, you examine emergency response plans for responding to rare or uncommon events. In addition, you examine key aspects of the Incident Command System (ICS). Then, you complete a course to earn an Emergency Management Institute (EMI) certificate from FEMA.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Evaluate impact of HSPD-5 on domestic disaster response
  • Evaluate provisions of HSPD-5
  • Evaluate the need for emergency response contingency plans
  • Apply concepts and procedures related to Incident Command Systems

Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 (HSPD-5) was executed by President Bush in 2003 to encourage a more coordinated federal response to emergency situations in the United States. It is very proscriptive with regard to what is required by the federal government, and there are strong ramifications for local governments. Even school districts need a strategy to deal with HSPD-5, even though the executive order itself is federal. Some have claimed that HSPD-5 oversteps the boundaries of federalism, yet others claim that it has encouraged a more expedient and cooperative response to large scale emergencies.

For this Discussion, consider whether or not HSPD-5 has had a direct impact on local disaster response. Then, consider whether that impact has had a beneficial, harmful, or negligible effect on domestic disaster response. Finally, consider whether or not any aspects of HSPD-5 should be changed or amended now that it has been in effect for a number of years and why.

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 3

Post your position on the impact of HSPD-5, that is, do you think it is beneficial, harmful, or has little to no impact.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.

By Day 5

Respond to at least one of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

  • Select someone(s) with a different position from your own.
  • Explain how and why the other person’s argument is flawed.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.

Discussion 2: Emergency Response Plans for Rare or Uncommon Events

Emergency response is not limited to natural disasters or acts of terrorism. In fact, the scope of emergency management encompasses all events that are unexpected and have the potential to impact a wide population. In October 2011, dozens of rare and exotic animals escaped a private zoo in Ohio to which the local community’s emergency management team responded. When the incident was over, forty-nine, of the fifty-six animals who escaped, were killed by sheriff’s deputies. Could this situation have been avoided if there had been an emergency response plan in place for rare or uncommon events? Should all communities have in place a plan for responding to such events?

For this Discussion, consider whether the wild animal incident in Ohio required an emergency response and why. Then consider whether community emergency response plans should contain contingencies for rare or uncommon events.

With these thoughts in mind:

By Day 4

Post your position on whether the wild animal incident in Ohio required an emergency response and why. Then explain whether community emergency response plans should contain contingencies for rare or uncommon events and why. Justify your response with references to the Learning Resources and current literature.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.

By Day 6

Respond to at least one of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

  • Select someone(s) with a different position from your own.
  • Explain how and why the other person’s argument is flawed.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.

3 Simple steps to get your paper done

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

Place Order Down to work Paper is Ready!

Takes just a few minutes!

Best writer takes the order

Access via your account

Order Now

error: ...